Feed aggregator

4 reasons to join the MineCoin ICO

Bitcoin feeds -

Bitcoin Press Release: Initially, ICO MineCoin got more than 150,000$. Everyone interested in purchasing MineCoin at the lowest price, 1 BTC = 1000 MNC, and with the biggest bonus of 33% to acquired Minecoins should hurry up. Too little time is left to the price increase when 1 BTC will be equal to 800 MNC and bonus will decrease to 25%. It will happen on the 6th of October 2016.

1. MineCoin Can Be Used to Buy Anything Ranging from Pens to a Stake in the Companies.

MineCoin is the cryptocurrency used by Minex Ecosystem. The Minex ecosystem is a combination of various products and services built around the Minex platform using MineCoin as the only unit of payment. The MineCoin blockchain is responsible for the decentralization of Minex ecosystem

All goods and services which available in Minex Ecosystem are sold only for minecoins. This is facilitated by the following projects:

a. Minex Platform

Minex platform — is specially designed platform to invest and make it easier for investors to manage and track the progress of their investments. At the same time, it also allows businesses, startups, and even the non-profits to attract investments. It seems like Kickstarter or Indiegogo but Minex platform also includes a whole range of additional features for investors and founders of projects and startups.

On Minex platform, minecoin owners can use MineCoin to buy digital shares of companies they are interested in and also receive dividends.

b. Minex Exchange

Minex Exchange — is a part of the Minex ecosystem, it is an decentralized exchange platform for digital assets like shares, currencies, bonds, options, futures contracts and other derivatives. All these financial instruments on Minex Exchange can be traded only with MineCoin. Users can convert their MineCoin to any currency or financial instrument.

The main advantage of MinexExchange — is a security which is supported by decentralization of Minex Exchange functions (private keys are not stored in one place).

c. Minex Bank

Minex Bank — one of the key elements of the Minex ecosystem, Minex Bank performs a variety of functions, some of which are comparable to that of a Central bank such as:

i. Maintaining the stability of MineCoin to make it an attractive alternative option for storing value. By eliminating high volatility — the issue plaguing rest of the cryptocurrency industry, Minex Bank allows investors to park their funds in the form of MineCoin without worrying about losses due to price fluctuations, like in the case of other cryptocurrencies.

ii. Smart Lending — is a novel feature offered by Minex Bank. The feature is backed by a credit reputation system that determines the eligibility of a borrower based on activities and previous record on the Minex ecosystem. By using smart contracts and sophisticated algorithms, Minex Bank allows the community members to borrow MineCoin without any direct human participation.

iii. Minex Bank also accepts deposits from its community members. MineCoin deposits, like any bank deposits, can be transferred to Minex Bank for safe keeping while earning rewards for it.

d. Minex Market

Minex Market — is an online marketplace of the Minex ecosystem. Targeted towards the mass market, it is open for the community to buy and sell anything for MineCoin. It is the ideal place to spend MineCoin on products and services.

2.Becoming a Shareholder of Minex Systems

MineCoin is a commercial project, the rights to which belongs to Minex Systems. For each transaction, the platform charges a commission of 0.1 MNC. As the platform opens up subscriptions, all future investors participating in the subscription round will be issued tokens that entitle them to receive a share of the transaction fees from the MineCoin payments system.

Interested investors can take part in the MineCoin subscription here.

3.Bonus Options

Everyone who buys MineCoin between September 1, 2016, and October 6, 2016, are eligible for a bonus of max 33% (1.17% daily from the date of buying till October 6, 2016 ).

Everyone who buys MineCoin between October 6, 2016, and November 2, 2016, are eligible for a bonus of max 25% (0.89% daily from the date of buying till November 2, 2016 ).

Everyone who buys MineCoin between November 6, 2016, and November 30, 2016, are eligible for a bonus of max 10% (0.35% daily from the date of buying till November 2, 2016 ).

For example: If you buy 1000 MNC on October 6, 2016, at 0.89% as a daily bonus, then the total MNC balance in your possession by the end of the day will by 1008.9 MNC, 1017.8 MNC on the second and so on. The bonus is added to the sum of replenishment and not on the balance. That is, if you buy additional 500 MNC at 0.89% (daily) then the network will calculate bonus for the total 1500 MNC from the date of purchase (13.35 MNC per day, until November 3, 2016).

Also important to understand that minecoin price will be rising every 4-week period.

08.09–05.10 1 BTC = 1000 MNC

06.10–02.11 1 BTC = 800 MNC

03.11–30.11 1 BTC =640 MNC

01.12–28.12 1 BTC = 512 MNC

As the platform offers bonuses on a daily basis and the price of minecoin increase every 4 week , it is more beneficial to subscribe to MineCoin sooner than later.

4.Investment Back Guarantee

Minex Systems guarantees to return all the investments made so far, as part of the subscription if it fails to reach the fundraising goal of 2882 BTCs. All the funds collected will be refunded to respective wallet addresses specified by investors in their personal profiles on MinexLight.

To learn more about MineCoin, please visit: https://minecoin.org/

Media Contact

Contact Person: Daniel Shulyaev

Contact Email: danielshulyaev@gmail.com

Location: Kyiv, Ukraine

MineCoin is the source of this content. Virtual currency is not legal tender, is not backed by the government, and accounts and value balances are not subject to consumer protections. This press release is for informational purposes only. The information does not constitute investment advice or an offer to invest.

About Bitcoin PR Buzz:

Bitcoin PR Buzz has been proudly serving the PR and marketing needs of Bitcoin and digital currency tech start-ups for over 2 years. Get your own professional Bitcoin and digital currency Press Release. Click here for more information.

The post 4 reasons to join the MineCoin ICO appeared first on Bitcoin PR Buzz.

Visit 4 reasons to join the MineCoin ICO on .

Shadow Regulation: the Back-Room Threat to Digital Rights

EFF's Deeplinks -

When a new law threatens to stifle online speech, to limit our use of the Internet, or allow others to control our digital devices, we can push back in a variety of ways—participating in formal consultations, calling or petitioning our representatives, exposing the proposal through the media, and bringing a legal challenge if the law passes, and so on. When individual companies threaten our rights, we also have options, ranging from boycotting that company, to "shaming" it into changing its practices, or if nothing else works, bringing a lawsuit or invoking regulatory action.

But what do we do when the same threats aren't the result of a law or the practices of an individual company, but the result of a private industry agreement? For example, agreements between copyright holders and Internet companies that give copyright holders the ability to effectively delete users' content from the Internet, and agreements on other topics such as hateful speech and terrorism that can be used to stifle lawful speech. Unlike laws, such agreements (sometimes also called codes, standard, principles, or guidelines) aren't developed with public input or accountability. As a result, users who are affected by them are often completely unaware that they even exist.

Even those who are aware of these agreements have few options for changing them, because users aren't a party to these private deals. They tend to cover multiple companies, so shaming or boycotting a single company isn't an option. And asking regulators to step in might not be possible either, because these agreements often have the active support of government officials who see them as a cheap and easy alternative to regulation.

We are calling these invisible and unaccountable arrangements Shadow Regulation. Here are a few representative examples:

  • The Copyright Alert System or "six strikes" program between U.S. Internet providers and the content industry, which provides for monitoring of your Internet usage and the delivery of warning notices about copyright infringement.
  • The European Commission's hate speech code of conduct, under which major U.S. Internet companies agreed to an expedited process for the removal of supposed hate speech and terrorist activity online.
  • The Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) Trusted Notifier Program, which requires Internet domain name registries Radix and Donuts to disable the domains of websites that are accused of hosting infringing content.
  • The RogueBlock guidelines for payment providers, and Trustworthy Ads Guidelines for advertising networks, which block websites accused of hosting infringing content from accessing payment processing and advertising services.

It's time to bring these agreements, or Shadow Regulations, into the bright light of public scrutiny.

Today we're unveiling a new, revamped version of our interactive Free Speech Weak Links infographic, that maps some key instances of Shadow Regulation that exist at various levels of the Internet ecosystem where content and user behavior can be effectively blocked and controlled. At the same time, we're launching a series of blog posts that will delve deeper into particular agreements. As new Shadow Regulation threats emerge (such as a recent European proposal requiring Web platforms to do deals with media companies), we'll also be offering you the opportunity to speak out against them.

Shadow Regulation may be a new term, but it's a phenomenon that has been gathering speed for several years. To defend our Internet, we need to pay attention to the encroachment of these secretive, exclusive agreements, and challenge them when they pose a threat to our digital rights and democracy. Keep reading Deeplinks this week as we explore Shadow Regulation in more detail, and explain how industry-wide agreements, where they have to exist at all, could be done in a more inclusive, balanced, and accountable fashion.


Share this: Join EFF

Five Lawmakers Are Challenging Gag Orders on FBI National Security Letters

The Intercept -

The Department of Justice’s policies surrounding lengthy gag orders on secret FBI requests for records are unconstitutional, wrote five members of Congress in a legal brief filed Thursday.

When companies or individuals receive these requests, known as national security letters, they are not typically allowed to share any of the content—or even say that they received such a request—except with an attorney. The FBI does not need to consult a judge to file those requests.

“The FBI’s [national security letter] authority is bound by the law and constitutional limits,” reads the brief, which was signed by U.S Representatives Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.), James Sensenbrenner (R-Wisc.), John Conyers (D-Mich.), Anna Eshoo (D-Calif.), and Ted Poe (R-Texas).“It is [our] view that the rules currently in place for reviewing NSL nondisclosure orders do not meet the requirements of the USA FREEDOM Act and are unconstitutional.”

The Department of Justice’s protracted review procedures for freeing targets of the gag orders violate the First Amendment, they argued in the brief, which was filed in support of a years-long case being waged by the Electronic Frontier Foundation on behalf of an unnamed client.

According to numbers released by the FBI to Congress, the FBI issued nearly 50,000 national security letters between 2013 and 2015—the vast majority of which still have gag orders.

Very few national security letters have ever been disclosed to the public. Rare cases include three such letters published by Yahoo and another disclosed by the host of a small Internet Service Provider, Nicholas Merrill, who fought for that right in court for more than ten years.

Though the White House typically has jurisdiction over matters of national security, the lawmakers argued this was a special case where congressional interpretation of the law is vital, and they believe the Department of Justice’s failure to remove gag orders attached to these letters after extensive periods of time is not in line with the law.

The FBI and the Department of Justice have been criticized in the past for failing to lift gag orders attached to those secret requests, even after investigations have concluded. According to the USA Freedom Act passed in 2015, non-disclosure obligations are meant to be limited in time.

 

Sign up for The Intercept Newsletter here.

The post Five Lawmakers Are Challenging Gag Orders on FBI National Security Letters appeared first on The Intercept.

Four States Sue To Stop Internet Transition

Slashdot -

An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Hill: Republican attorneys general in four states are filing a lawsuit to block the transfer of internet domain systems oversight from the U.S. to an international governing body. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich, Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt and Nevada Attorney General Paul Laxalt filed a lawsuit on Wednesday night to stop the White House's proposed transition of Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) functions. The state officials cite constitutional concerns in their suit against the National Telecommunications and Information Administration, U.S. government and the Department of Commerce. "The Obama Administration's decision violates the Property Clause of the U.S. Constitution by giving away government property without congressional authorization, the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution by chilling speech, and the Administrative Procedure Act by acting beyond statutory authority," a statement released by Paxton's office reads. The attorneys generals claim that the U.S. government is ceding government property, pointing to a Government Accountability Office (GAO) review that "concluded that the transition does not involve a transfer of U.S. government property requiring Congressional approval." Paxton also echoed Texas Sen. Ted Cruz's warnings that the transition could harm free speech on the internet by giving Russia, China and Iran a voice on the international governing body that would oversee internet domain systems. "Trusting authoritarian regimes to ensure the continued freedom of the internet is lunacy," Paxton said. "The president does not have the authority to simply give away America's pioneering role in ensuring that the internet remains a place where free expression can flourish."

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Real business innovation begins with open practices

LXer -

To business leaders, "open source" often sounds too altruistic—and altruism is in short supply on the average balance sheet. But using and contributing to open source makes hard-nosed business sense, particularly as a way of increasing innovation.read more

Pages

Subscribe to debianHELP aggregator